MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2338010517 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.014431

Frustrated magnetism in the double perovskite<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>LiOs</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>: A comparison with<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>LiRu</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2016· article· lv· W2338010517 on OpenAlexafffund
Corey M. Thompson, Casey Marjerrison, Arzoo Sharma, C. R. Wiebe, Dalini Maharaj, Gabriele Sala, Roxana Flacau, Alannah M. Hallas, Yipeng Cai, B. D. Gaulin, G. M. Luke, John E. Greedan

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2016
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
Canadian institutionsBrockhouse Institute for Materials ResearchCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchCanadian Nuclear LaboratoriesUniversity of WinnipegMcMaster University
FundersBasic Energy SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsIsostructuralCrystallographyMagnetismCondensed matter physicsCrystal structureChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The frustrated double perovskite $\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{LiOs}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$, based on $\mathrm{O}{\mathrm{s}}^{5+}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}(5{d}^{3},\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{t}}_{2}^{3})$ is studied using magnetization, elastic neutron scattering, heat capacity, and muon spin relaxation (\ensuremath{\mu}SR) techniques and compared with isostructural $(P{2}_{1}/n)\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{LiRu}{\mathrm{O}}_{6},\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{R}{\mathrm{u}}^{5+}(4{d}^{3},\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{t}}_{2}^{3})$. While previous studies of $\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{LiOs}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$ showed a broad susceptibility maximum $({\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{max}})$ near 40 K, heat capacity data indicate a sharp peak at 30 K, similar to $\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{LiRu}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$ with ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{max}}\ensuremath{\sim}30\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$ and a heat capacity peak at 24 K. Significant differences between the two materials are seen in powder neutron diffraction where the magnetic structure is described by $\mathbit{k}=(1/2\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}1/2\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}0)$ for $\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{LiOs}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$, while $\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{LiRu}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$ has been reported with $\mathbit{k}=(000)$, structure for face centered lattices. For the $\mathbit{k}=(1/2\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}1/2\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}0)$ structure, one has antiferromagnetic layers stacked antiferromagnetically, while for $\mathbit{k}=(0\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}0\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}0)$ structure, ferromagnetic layers are stacked antiferromagnetically. In spite of these differences, both can be considered as type I fcc antiferromagnetic structures. For $\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{LiOs}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$, the magnetic structure is best described in terms of linear combinations of basis vectors belonging to irreducible representations ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}}_{2}$ and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}}_{4}$. The combinations ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}}_{2}--{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}}_{4}$ and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}}_{2}+{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}}_{4}$ could not be distinguished from refinement of the data. In all cases, the $\mathrm{O}{\mathrm{s}}^{5+}$ moments lie in the $yz$ plane with the largest component along $y$. The total moment is 1.81(4) ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{B}}$. For $\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{LiRu}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$, the $\mathrm{R}{\mathrm{u}}^{5+}$ moments are reported to lie in the $xz$ plane. In addition, while neutron diffraction, \ensuremath{\mu}SR and NMR data indicate a unique ${T}_{\mathrm{N}}=24\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$ for $\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{LiRu}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$, the situation for $\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{LiOs}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$ is more complex, with heat capacity, neutron diffraction, and \ensuremath{\mu}SR indicating two ordering events at 30 and 37 K, similar to the cases of cubic $\mathrm{B}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{YRu}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$ and monoclinic $\mathrm{S}{\mathrm{r}}_{2}\mathrm{YRu}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicMagnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materialsFrench-language works237,207