Frustrated magnetism in the double perovskite<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>LiOs</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>: A comparison with<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>LiRu</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The frustrated double perovskite $\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{LiOs}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$, based on $\mathrm{O}{\mathrm{s}}^{5+}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}(5{d}^{3},\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{t}}_{2}^{3})$ is studied using magnetization, elastic neutron scattering, heat capacity, and muon spin relaxation (\ensuremath{\mu}SR) techniques and compared with isostructural $(P{2}_{1}/n)\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{LiRu}{\mathrm{O}}_{6},\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{R}{\mathrm{u}}^{5+}(4{d}^{3},\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{t}}_{2}^{3})$. While previous studies of $\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{LiOs}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$ showed a broad susceptibility maximum $({\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{max}})$ near 40 K, heat capacity data indicate a sharp peak at 30 K, similar to $\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{LiRu}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$ with ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{max}}\ensuremath{\sim}30\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$ and a heat capacity peak at 24 K. Significant differences between the two materials are seen in powder neutron diffraction where the magnetic structure is described by $\mathbit{k}=(1/2\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}1/2\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}0)$ for $\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{LiOs}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$, while $\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{LiRu}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$ has been reported with $\mathbit{k}=(000)$, structure for face centered lattices. For the $\mathbit{k}=(1/2\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}1/2\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}0)$ structure, one has antiferromagnetic layers stacked antiferromagnetically, while for $\mathbit{k}=(0\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}0\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}0)$ structure, ferromagnetic layers are stacked antiferromagnetically. In spite of these differences, both can be considered as type I fcc antiferromagnetic structures. For $\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{LiOs}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$, the magnetic structure is best described in terms of linear combinations of basis vectors belonging to irreducible representations ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}}_{2}$ and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}}_{4}$. The combinations ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}}_{2}--{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}}_{4}$ and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}}_{2}+{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}}_{4}$ could not be distinguished from refinement of the data. In all cases, the $\mathrm{O}{\mathrm{s}}^{5+}$ moments lie in the $yz$ plane with the largest component along $y$. The total moment is 1.81(4) ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{B}}$. For $\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{LiRu}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$, the $\mathrm{R}{\mathrm{u}}^{5+}$ moments are reported to lie in the $xz$ plane. In addition, while neutron diffraction, \ensuremath{\mu}SR and NMR data indicate a unique ${T}_{\mathrm{N}}=24\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$ for $\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{LiRu}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$, the situation for $\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{LiOs}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$ is more complex, with heat capacity, neutron diffraction, and \ensuremath{\mu}SR indicating two ordering events at 30 and 37 K, similar to the cases of cubic $\mathrm{B}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{YRu}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$ and monoclinic $\mathrm{S}{\mathrm{r}}_{2}\mathrm{YRu}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".