Selective and Sustained Inhibition of Surface-bound Thrombin Activity by Intimatan/Heparin Cofactor II and Its Relevance to Assessing Systemic Anticoagulation In Vivo, Ex Vivo and In Vitro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We compare the relative activities of surface-bound and fluid-phase thrombin and their inhibition by heparin and Intimatan, a novel heparin cofactor II (HCII) agonist. In vitro, we compared the observed amidolytic activities of fluid-phase and surface-bound thrombin with the expected activities based upon 125I-specific activity. In vivo, we compared the inhibitory effects of heparin and Intimatan on thrombin activity bound to injured vessel walls. In vitro, the correlations between observed and expected activities of fluid-phase and surface-bound thrombin, were: r = 0.9974, p < 0.001; and r = 0.9678, p < 0.001; respectively. In vivo, injured vessel wall surface-bound thrombin activity persisted for > 24 h. This activity was not inhibited by heparin, but was inhibited by Intimatan, p < 0.001. We conclude that surface-bound thrombin is as active as fluid-phase thrombin and remains protected from inhibition by heparin, thereby contributing to vessel wall thrombogenicity following injury. In contrast, surface-bound thrombin is inhibited by Intimatan, thereby effectively decreasing vessel wall thrombogenicity following injury in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".