MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2338145786

Telomere dysfunction in prostatic carcinogenesis: The crognostic importance of telomere length in HPIN (high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia)

2006· article· en· W2338145786 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony M. Joshua, Bisera Vukovic, Ilan Braude, Andrew Evans, John R. Srigley, Jeremy A. Squire

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelomereChromosome instabilityCarcinogenesisBiologyGenome instabilityCancer researchCancerIntraepithelial neoplasiaProstateProstate cancerChromosomeTelomerasePathologyGeneticsMedicineDNA damageGeneDNA
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proc Amer Assoc Cancer Res, Volume 47, 2006 4992 One of the major types of genetic instability in human malignancies is characterized by abnormal karyotypes, featuring both structural and numerical chromosome abnormalities and is termed chromosomal instability (CIN). CIN has been demonstrated in both carcinoma of the prostate (CaP) and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HPIN). Both the chromosomal and genetic changes observed in HPIN are similar to those seen in primary CaP. Telomeres are the terminal repeated DNA sequence associated with specific binding proteins of eukaryotic chromosomes. Natural shortening of telomeres with each cell division has been thought to act as a mitotic clock limiting the replicative potential of the cell. Excessive telomere shortening leads to end-to-end chromosomal fusion thereby to unstable chromosomal rearrangements and cell death. This laboratory previously found a significant decrease in telomere length in both HPIN and CaP in comparison to normal prostatic epithelium and more erosion evident in HPIN in the discrete regions of the prostate containing CaP. Therefore we hypothesise that the loss of telomere integrity and the resulting chromosomal instability (CIN) is an early fundamental event in CaP oncogenesis and that measurement of telomere length in HPIN associated with telomere dysfunction will provide prognostic information about progression to CaP and clinical outcome. We have analysed sextant core biopsies from 80 patients with HPIN from 1998-2000 (41 diagnosed subsequently with CaP and 39 without CaP on rebiopsy) with a minimum clinical and pathological follow up of 4 years. To correlate the morphology of fluorescently labelled and DAPI-counterstained tissue sections containing HPIN, an adjacent H&E section has been obtained for each biopsy studied. To examine telomere length distribution within HPIN in the cohort, we have used quantitative fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (Q-FISH) analysis of interphase nuclei in paraffin embedded sections with directly labelled telomere specific PNA probes as the resulting fluorescence emission is known to be directly proportional to telomere length. Internal control probes for centromere intensity have also been used. Current pathways of HPIN to CaP involving genes such as PTEN and ETS transcription factors are simultaneously being investigated. Statistical associations between telomere length in the HPIN sample, gene detection and the subsequent diagnosis of cancer and the Gleason score will be reported. These analyses will help determine whether telomere erosion provides a useful biomarker for the development of prostate cancer and reveal mechanisms underlying genomic instability in this neoplasm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence→French-language works237,207→