MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2338160501 · doi:10.20286/nova-jmbs-03035

Microbiological Properties of Cows Meat Dehydrated Using Solar-Drying, Sun-Drying and Oven Drying

2014· article· en· W2338160501 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohamed A. Talib, Azmy Hj. Mohamed, K. Ngargueudedjim

Bibliographic record

VenueNova Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMeat and Animal Product Quality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood scienceVacuum dryingFreeze-dryingChemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Meat samples were dipped in three different concentrations (2, 4 and 8 %) of sodium chloride combined with 120ppm sodium nitrite and 300ppm ascorbic acid for 30 minutes at room temperature (30°C). Meat samples were then separated into two equal batches and dried by two methods (solar or oven drying) of dehydration. Untreated meat samples were used as control and dried by sun-drying. Dehydrated meat samples were kept in plastic containers for two months at room temperature. Meat samples were taken after drying and during storage for microbiological (total plate count, coliforms / faecal coliforms, Staphylococci and molds and yeasts counts) analyses. Results showed that meat strips dipped in NaCl combined with preservatives decreased gradually log No/ g. The methods of drying were found to have a significant effect on decreasing microbial count and were higher in oven followed by solar and sun-drying. Both solar and oven drying were found to be better than sun-drying but due to energy cost solar-drying could be considered the best.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.193
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.110 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNova Journal of Medical and Biological SciencesSame topicMeat and Animal Product QualityFrench-language works237,207