MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2338173581 · doi:10.18638/ictic.2016.5.1.290

Impacts on One-off Housing Arising from Amended Building Control Regulations in Ireland

2016· article· en· W2338173581 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
K. Compton, Myles Keaveney

Bibliographic record

VenueInformation and Communication Technologies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFacilities and Workplace Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkmanshipIrishWork (physics)Control (management)Quarter (Canadian coin)BusinessPopulationOrder (exchange)EngineeringOperations managementFinanceEconomicsGeographySociologyManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single rural housing is very common in the Irish countryside. The Irish Central Statistics Office reported that one-off housing represented over a quarter of the total number of households in 2011. One-off houses are defined as occupied detached houses with individual septic tank wastewater treatment systems in rural areas (which include towns with a population of 1,500 or less).\nThe purpose of this study is to determine the increased cost to the consumer resulting from the introduction of the new Building Control (Amendment) Regulations 2014. In order to achieve the objective, a detailed description of past and current building control systems operating in Ireland is presented. \nPhenomenal growth was recorded in the construction industry between 2000 and 2007. This period saw the construction of new housing units peak at 93,000 in 2006. Unfortunately, this increase in output was associated with a decrease in the standard of building work being carried out. Many attribute this fall in standards to the inadequate building control system in place. This system did little by way of protecting the Irish consumer. This sub-standard method of building control led to the reputation of the construction industry being irreparably damaged as builders and other professionals failed to work in a manner of compliance and accountability. This culture of non-compliance resulted in many publicised cases involving defective materials and unsatisfactory workmanship. This led to the introduction of the Building Control (Amendment) Regulations 2014.\nFor the purpose of gathering information on this topic, the author utilized both quantitative and qualitative methods in the form of questionnaires and interviews. \nThe revised system of building control should increase the standard of building work in the case of all building types. A series of measures has been implemented, the most important of which is that a registered professional will be employed to monitor the ongoing progress of each project and at the end of the project will have to certify that all Building Regulations have been complied with during the construction process. The research has revealed the costs that will be borne by the consumer as a consequence of increased design work and ongoing inspection activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInformation and Communication TechnologiesSame topicFacilities and Workplace ManagementFrench-language works237,207