MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2338225562 · doi:10.1080/07038992.2016.1152547

Improved Sea Ice Concentration Estimation Through Fusing Classified SAR Imagery and AMSR-E Data

2016· article· en· W2338225562 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Lei Wang, K. Andrea Scott, David A. Clausi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceSynthetic aperture radarRemote sensingPixelSea ice concentrationSea ice thicknessEnvironmental scienceArctic ice packGeologyComputer scienceClimatologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

. A method to automatically combine binary ice/water information from synthetic aperture radar (SAR) sea ice images with the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-EOS (AMSR-E) daily ice concentration product is proposed for the purpose of generating sea ice concentration estimates with improved detail and accuracy. First, each pixel in the SAR image is labeled as ice or water using the MAp-Guided Ice Classification (MAGIC) SAR image classification system. Second, the labeled pixels are modeled as a Bernoulli process and combined with the AMSR-E ice concentration data in a Bayesian framework to generate improved ice concentration estimation. Visually interpreted ice/water extent and sea ice image analyses from the Canadian Ice Service (CIS) are used as comparison data. The combination of SAR ice/water labeled pixels with the AMSR-E ice concentration is shown to improve the ice concentration estimates, especially at the ice edge where substantial improvements are observed. Although the present study uses ice/water information from SAR, the method is general and could be used with other sources of ice/water remote sensed data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Remote SensingSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207