Development Rate, Consumption, and Host Specificity of<i>Carea varipes</i>(Lepidoptera: Nolidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Asian shrub Rhodomyrtus tomentosa is an invasive weed in Florida and Hawaii, USA. Surveys for natural enemies of this exotic shrub in Hong Kong, China, resulted in the development of a laboratory colony and initial host range testing of Carea varipes Walker as a potential biological control agent of R. tomentosa . Twelve critical test plant species were presented to C. varipes larvae, but complete development was limited to R. tomentosa , the ornamental Myrtus communis , and the Florida native Morella cerifera . Total development time was >10 d faster when held with R. tomentosa and M. communis versus M. cerifera , with the latter species requiring an extra larval instar to reach the pupal stage. Total consumption levels over an individual’s larval stage were similar among R. tomentosa and M. cerifera but, when the longer development time associated with the latter host is accounted for, consumption rates indicate that larvae consumed >2 times more leaf material when held with the Florida native. Despite an apparent preference for R. tomentosa , it is clear that the physiological host range of C. varipes includes the Florida native M. cerifera and the ornamentally important M. communis . The generalized feeding patterns exhibited in this research indicates that additional resources dedicated to the development of this species as a biological control agent are unwarranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".