MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A12: PDL-1 blockade and Sunitinib enhance the efficiency of oncolytic viral therapy

2015· article· en· W2338380682 on OpenAlex
Ahmed Mostafa, Kathy Gratton, Keith A. Lawson, Zhong-Qiao Shi, Chandini M. Thirukkumaran, Don Morris

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Immunology Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsAlberta Cancer Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOncolytic virusSunitinibCancer researchImmune systemMyeloid-derived Suppressor CellCytotoxic T cellMedicineImmunotherapyIn vivoImmunologyRenal cell carcinomaCancerBiologyIn vitroOncologyInternal medicineSuppressor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose: Oncolytic viruses (OV) are attractive for use against multiple tumours given their ability to prime therapeutic immune responses in addition to their direct cytotoxic effects. We investigated the utility of reovirus, an OV currently in phase III clinical trials, as a novel immunotherapeutic against renal cell (RCC), non small cell lung (NSCLC) and breast carcinomas (BrCa) as both a monotherapy and in combination with sunitinib, a first line metastatic RCC agent. In addition the utility of adding an immune checkpoint inhibitor was investigated. Experimental Design: In-vitro, cytotoxicity, viral replication and chemokine production were assessed in a panel of human and murine cancer cell lines following exposure to reovirus, sunitinib or their combination. In-vivo, RENCA (murine renal cell carcinoma) cells were implanted subcutaneously into female balb/c mice to establish a syngeneic immunocompetent model of RCC. Tumor growth and overall survival were assessed following treatment with reovirus, sunitinib or their combination. IFN-γ, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), and protective immunity were assessed by ELISA, flow cytometry (Gr1+/CD11b+) and adoptive transfer experiments, respectively. PDL-1 and PD-1 expression on both tumour and immune cells were assayed. Results: In vitro, exposure of RCC cell lines to reovirus resulted in an inflammatory cytotoxic response that was augmented through combination with sunitinib. In vivo, reovirus significantly reduced RENCA tumor burden and generated an anti-tumor immune response that was augmented by sunitinib. Combinations with sunitinib also lead to a decrease in myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and resulted in improved overall survival and enhanced protective immunity. Preliminary results in NSCLC and BrCa are suggestive that this strategy maybe applicable to many cancer histologies. Both PDL-1 and PD-1 expression were up regulated by RV (similar to IFN gamma) in the majority of cell lines tested suggesting a potential role for checkpoint blockade (CB). Conclusions: Reovirus has both direct oncolytic and immunotherapeutic activity against RCC, which is augmented through combination with sunitinib. The role of immune CB is ongoing. These proof-of-principle investigations provide clear rationale to investigate RV/sunitinib/immune CB as a promising approach for early phase clinical trials as a novel treatment strategy for cancer. Citation Format: Ahmed Mostafa, Kathy Gratton, Keith A. Lawson, Zhong-Qiao Shi, Chandini Thirukkumaran, Don G. Morris. PDL-1 blockade and Sunitinib enhance the efficiency of oncolytic viral therapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy: A New Chapter; December 1-4, 2014; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2015;3(10 Suppl):Abstract nr A12.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it