Porosity and pore size distribution in mudrocks from the Belle Fourche and Second White Specks Formations in Alberta, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The distribution of porosity was examined on seven drill cores from west–central Alberta encompassing the Belle Fourche and Second White Specks Formations. These Cenomanian–Turonian mudrocks from the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin exhibit good organic richness (>2 wt. % total organic carbon) and marine kerogen type II with limited kerogen type III. With the increasing thermal maturity from approximately 0.43% vitrinite reflectance (Ro) to approximately 0.90% Ro, the total porosity decreases from approximately 9 to approximately 1 vol. %. This change translates to a reduction in total pore volume from approximately 0.05 to approximately 0.005 cm3/g and is accompanied by changes in relative proportions of micropore, mesopore, and macropore volumes. Variations in total porosity for the seven cores with different thermal maturities across Alberta are mainly related to mesoporosity and macroporosity, although the in-core variations in total porosity are mainly related to microporosity. In general, organic matter micropores contribute to the overall microporosity in the seven cores across the study area. The increase in the total pore volumes is in accordance with an increasing concentration of quartz, although increasing concentrations of chlorite and kaolinite may contribute to greater abundance of micropores in the seven cores. The in-core variations suggest that greater contents of kaolinite and illite may contribute to increasing mesopore volumes. Variations in pore volumes and pore size distribution with depth within individual cores (representing specific thermal maturity level) differ from what is observed laterally, when cores of various thermal maturity levels across Alberta are compared, indicating complex controls on porosity systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".