MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

10 Quantitative myocardial perfusion and longitudinal strain by feature tracking in newly diagnosed, treatment naïve rheumatoid arthritis

2016· article· en· W2338427312 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Graham Fent, Pankaj Garg, Laura E Dobson, Tarique A Musa, James Foley, Peter Swoboda, John P. Greenwood, Sven Plein

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineEjection fractionCoronary artery diseasePerfusionRheumatoid arthritisCoronary flow reserveMyocardial perfusion imagingNuclear medicineHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Objectives</h3> Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality. Proposed mechanisms include coronary microvascular dysfunction due to immune dysregulation and systemic inflammation. First pass myocardial perfusion CMR allows quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR). In the absence of coronary artery disease (CAD), reduced MPR represents coronary microvascular dysfunction. We hypothesised MPR would be reduced in RA and that abnormalities in left ventricular (LV) deformation would be evident in RA, as LV mass has been reported to be reduced in established disease. <h3>Methods</h3> Twelve patients with newly diagnosed, treatment naïve RA and 12 healthy volunteers (HV) underwent CMR at 3.0T (Phillips Achieva TX). Both groups had no history of CAD. Dual bolus resting and stress perfusion imaging was performed (0.1mmol/kg Gadolinium DTPA) and MBF estimated for the mid ventricular slice using Fermi constrained convolution (PMI v 0.4 [Sourbron, 2009]). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) by feature tracking were calculated using bSSFP images (CVI <sup>42</sup>, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Calgary, Canada). <h3>Results</h3> Mean age of RA patients was 48 ± 16 and mean age of HV 47 ± 14. Of the RA patients, 4 were male and 8 female. Of the HV, 2 were male and 10 female. Mean MPR values were 1.98 ± 0.79 and 1.99 ± 0.72 (P = 0.88) for RA and HV respectively (Figure 1). Mean values for LVEF were 63 ± 4 and 62 ± 4% (P = 0.48) respectively for RA patients and HV. Mean values for GLS were −20.2 and −21 ± 0.4 (P = 0.396) for RA and HV respectively. <h3>Conclusion</h3> These findings suggest treatment naïve RA patients have no detectable abnormalities on perfusion CMR. Therefore, whilst present in established RA, coronary microvascular dysfunction may not yet have developed in early RA. No abnormalities of LV systolic function were evident and may be a later manifestation of RA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbstractsSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207