MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2338476366 · doi:10.5430/wje.v6n2p50

Language Models and the Teaching of English Language to Secondary School Students in Cameroon

2016· article· en· W2338476366 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Njwe Amah Eyovi Ntongieh

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Education · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnglish languageCompetence (human resources)Mathematics educationLanguage proficiencyLinguistic competencePsychologyPedagogyLanguage educationLanguage assessmentSociologyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates Language models with an emphasis on an appraisal of the Competence Based LanguageTeaching Model (CBLT) employed in the teaching and learning of English language in Cameroon. Researchendeavours at various levels combined with cumulative deficiencies experienced over the years have propellededucational policy makers to carry out various changes in the models emphasised in the teaching of language. Suchchanges have been undertaken in view of improving proficiency in communication as well as performance in variousexaminations. This is especially apt during this era when there is a dire need and great aspirations towards evolvingCameroon into an emergent nation by 2035. Findings derived from different educational stakeholders, includingpedagogic inspectors, as well as school administrators, teachers and students from secondary schools located in theNorth West and South West regions of the Republic of Cameroon have been used in this investigation.Questionnaires, observations and interviews were employed to elucidate the information analysed in this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of EducationSame topicEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningFrench-language works237,207