Experimental and Numerical Study of the Vibration of Stationary and Rotating Annular Disks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Numerical and experimental investigations are carried out to study the combined effect of rotation and support nonuniformity on the modal characteristics of circular thick disks. The laboratory experiments on stationary and rotating circular disks are conducted to investigate the effects of partial support conditions on the in-plane and out-of-plane vibration responses of annular disks with different radius ratios. Numerical results suggested that the nonuniformity of the support along the circumferential directions of the boundaries affects the modal characteristics of the disk along the in-plane and out-of-plane directions, while introducing additional coupling between the modes. Specifically, some of the frequency peaks in the frequency spectrum obtained under uniform boundary conditions split into two distinct peaks in the presence of a point support. The results show that the in-plane modes of vibration are comparable with those associated with out-of-plane modes and are contributing to the total noise radiation. The coupling between in-plane and out-of-plane modes is found to be quite significant due to the nonuniformity of the boundary conditions. The experimental study confirms the split in natural frequencies of the disk that is observed in the numerical results due to both rotation and support nonuniformity. The applicability and accuracy of the formulations is further examined through analysis of modal characteristics of a railway wheel in contact with the rail.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".