Experience with a triple-lumen catheter for autologous stem-cell transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We relate our experience with the Cook (Cook Medial Inc., Bloomington, IN, USA), triple-lumen hyperalimentation (HAS) catheter for treatment related to autologous stem-cell transplant. Nineteen HAS catheters were implanted in the right jugular vein, and tunneled to the right anterior chest wall, under imaging guidance. Retrospectively, we reviewed each catheter. Three patient's experienced "ballooning" of the middle (white) lumen of the HAS catheter during routine use. We assessed, time in situ, follow-up imaging, chemotherapy regimen, possibility of systemic or device infection, tissue pathology of the patient's malignancy, and other factors to attempt to determine if there were any associations that could explain the catheter lumen failure. After this pilot study of the HAS-catheter in these 19 patients, we discontinued use of this device at our facility due to mechanical problems of ballooned and obstructed middle lumens. There was no obvious cause, or association, detected to explain the ballooning identified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".