Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although navigation and surveying techniques have evolved since the days of sextants and azimuth compasses, two aspects of contemporary surveys have undergone little change : 1) the storage of documents collected at sea has not kept pace with technical developments in the field of data collection and manipulation ; and, 2) few hydrographic cruises are only slowly returning to the multidisciplinary mentality which prevailed in earlier times. Echograms and seismic records are essential tools in the interpretation of bathymetric data and the production of bathymetric and morphologic maps. Negligence in their care and preservation results in their deterioration and/or loss. It is proposed that these documents be copied onto 35 mm microfilm and the original documents granted archival status. The cost of this operation is minimal when compared to cruise costs. Pre-season briefings, a greater participation by scientists in cruises and familiarization of hydrographers with all scientific aspects of the cruises are suggested. This would result in a greater scientific return and closer co-operation between scientists and hydrographers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".