Moderate Drinking Classlfications as Social Constructions: The Utility of a Salutogenic Perspecitve in Assessing Drinking Behavior
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research study was a secondary analysis o f the 1994 National Population Health Survey (NPHS) of Canada. Men and women were analyzed separately to determine differences among myriad variables with, regard to average daily consumption of alcohol. Sociodemographic, physical health, mental health, cognitive/psychosocial, social support, and stress variables were tested. Of particular interest were cognitive/psychosocial variables, specifically sense o f coherence, to determine if these measures differed significantly across groups based on alcohol consumption patterns. Three research problems were addressed: (1) the paucity o f research studies on alcohol consumption from a genuine salutogenic perspective; (2) the consistent combination of light and moderate drinkers in many studies on alcohol consumption; and (3) it is argued here that, moderate drinking classifications currently cited by the USDA/USDHHS, are social constructions due to the lack of a universal definition of moderate drinking, and more importantly, the neglect of individual characteristics when deriving such definitions. In general, the overall findings showed both male and females moderate drinkers demonstrated healthier, or better, measures on a wide variety of variables when, compared to abstainers or heavy drinkers, and had similar (no different) measures when compared to light or intermediate drinkers. The results supported the hypotheses that moderate drinkers would manifest comparable healthy characteristics to abstainers, light drinkers, and intermediate drinkers, and would demonstrate healthier characteristics compared to heavy drinkers, the importance of this research is its attempt to show that moderate drinking, when approached from a salutogenic perspective, can assist in future research that seeks to determine specific variables that predict individuals’ ability to use alcohol moderately, and consistently, without progressing to problem drinking, addiction, or alcoholism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".