Structural and functional consequences of missense mutations in exon 5 of the lipoprotein lipase gene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Missense mutations in exon 5 of the LPL gene are the most common reported cause of LPL deficiency. Exon 5 is also the region with the strongest homology to pancreatic and hepatic lipase, and is conserved in LPL from different species. Mutant LPL proteins from post-heparin plasma from patients homozygous for missense mutations at amino acid positions 176, 188, 194, 205, and 207, and from COS cells transiently transfected with the corresponding cDNAs were quantified and characterized, in an attempt to determine which aspect of enzyme function was affected by each specific mutation. All but one of the mutant proteins were present, mainly as partially denatured LPL monomer, rendering further detailed assessment of their catalytic activity, affinity to heparin, and binding to lipoprotein particles difficult. However, the fresh unstable Gly(188)-->Glu LPL and the stable Ile(194)-->Thr LPL, although in native conformation, did not express lipase activity. It is proposed that many of the exon 5 mutant proteins are unable to achieve or maintain native dimer conformation, and that the Ile(194)-->Thr substitution interferes with access of lipid substrate to the catalytic pocket. These results stress the importance of conformational evaluation of mutant LPL. Absence of catalytic activity does not necessarily imply that the substituted amino acid plays a specific direct role in catalysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".