MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2338754006 · doi:10.1080/07038992.2015.1112729

Cloud Detection Method Based on Spectral Area Ratios in MODIS Data

2015· article· en· W2338754006 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Feng Guo, Xiaohua Shen, Lejun Zou, Yupeng Ren, Yi Qin, Xin Wang, Jiwei Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric aerosols and clouds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModerate-resolution imaging spectroradiometerPixelRemote sensingCloud computingPreprocessorSpectroradiometerComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceGeographyArtificial intelligenceReflectivityPhysicsSatellite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A variety of clouds are present in almost all moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) images. To extract accurate information from MODIS data, a key preprocessing step is to detect the cloudy pixels. This article proposes a new algorithm to distinguish between cloudy and cloud-free pixels in MODIS images. This algorithm is based on the differences in the spectral areas between clouds and other surface features. It uses as many as 24 of the 36 MODIS spectral bands to obtain the integrated spectral information. The method has been illustrated by an example of 76 MODIS images recorded from 2011 to 2013. The results show that the algorithm is capable of correctly identifying most of the cloud-contaminated pixels except for some thin cloud pixels. We compared the new method with the MODIS Cloud Mask algorithm and found that the new algorithm performs better than the MODIS MOD35 Cloud Mask in some situation, such as coastal area, sun glint, and data with invalid values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Remote SensingSame topicAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsFrench-language works237,207