Synthesis and characterization of lignin–melamine–formaldehyde resin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lignin–melamine–formaldehyde (LMF) resin was prepared by three steps: (i) tosylation of lignin, (ii) synthesis of lignin-melamine (LM) copolymer, and (iii) formation of methylol LM. The synthesized resins were characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and phosphorous 31 nuclear magnetic resonance analysis. The curing parameters of LMF resin were determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermal gravimetric analysis. The yield of tosylation is 80%. The FTIR spectrum of tosylated lignin shows the presence of two new bands at 1171 and 1370 cm −1 . The formation of the LM was demonstrated by the disappearance of both bands and appearance of the absorbances at 3115, 3312, 3415, and 3470 cm −1 corresponding to the stretching vibrations of primary and secondary amine. The peaks observed at 147.0 and 148.5 ppm are attributed to the new aliphatic hydroxyl groups formed by the methylolation of LM. One exothermic peak was observed in the DSC analysis indicating a one cross-linking reaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".