Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper focuses on suppression of free vibration of single degree-of-freedom systems that possess time delay. The switchable stiffness (SS) control strategy is reviewed. The implication of time delay is examined. It shows that the system delay can cause malfunction of the direct SS control. To overcome this problem, the two time-delay control strategies are proposed. The first strategy named as half period delay SS control introduces an intentional delay such that the switch action takes place in a half of oscillation period later. The second strategy named as quarter period delay SS control is to add an intentional delay such that the switch action occurs in a quarter of oscillation period later. In this case, the SS control law is inverted. An apparatus consisting of an electromagnetic (EM) spring is developed to validate the proposed strategies. The stiffness models of the system are established. In computer simulation, three cases have been examined. In case A, the system is simplified as linear and the dynamics of the EMs is neglected. In case B, the stiffness models are used and the dynamics of the EMs is neglected. In case C, the stiffness models are used and the dynamics of the EMs is considered. An experimental study is conducted in real time. The results have validated the observations obtained from the computer simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".