MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2338843056 · doi:10.1016/j.jevs.2016.02.051

Detection and characterisation of Clostridium difficile in Australian Thoroughbred foals

2016· article· en· W2338843056 on OpenAlexaff
Kirsten E. Bailey, S.J. Symes, Kate E. Mackin, J. Rousseau, Dena Lyras, J. Scott Weese, Jane E. Axon, C. Russell, Carol A. Hartley, Glenn F. Browning, James R. Gilkerson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Equine Veterinary Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFoalClostridium difficileRibotypingFecesOutbreakDiarrheaEnteritisMedicineMicrobiologyHorseBiologyPolymerase chain reactionVeterinary medicineVirologyInternal medicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diarrhoea is a common disease in young foals that is labour intensive and costly to manage. A large number of infectious agents have been detected in foals with diarrhoea, but the pathogenic importance of many of these agents is poorly understood. Clostridium difficile has been associated with severe necrotising enteritis in foals, but has also been isolated from healthy foals. Hypervirulent strains of C. difficile, such as ribotypes 027 and 078, commonly associated with human hospital outbreaks of diarrhoea, have also been detected in some animal populations. There are limited data on C. difficile disease in Australian horses. In a prospective case control investigation of diarrhoea in foals, faecal samples were collected on five Thoroughbred breeding farms in New South Wales, Australia, from foals with diarrhoea and age-matched control foals (agematched pair). In addition, faeces were collected from foals with diarrhoea at an equine referral hospital. Foal faeces were tested for the presence of C. difficile using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay (qPCR) targeting the gene encoding triose phosphate isomerase. Anaerobic culture for C. difficile was performed on samples that tested positive by qPCR and isolates were further characterised by ribotyping. In total, 117 age

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Equine Veterinary ScienceSame topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchFrench-language works237,207