QoS-Aware Energy-Efficient Downlink Predictive Scheduler for OFDMA-Based Cellular Devices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a predictive energy-efficient scheduling scheme that optimizes the user equipment (UE)'s bits/joule metric subject to quality-of-service (QoS) constraints in downlink orthogonal frequency-division multiple access (OFDMA) systems. This is achieved by minimizing the number of wake-up transmission time intervals (TTIs), where the UE receiver circuit is on, in a longer time horizon than studied before. The proposed predictive scheduler is supported by a ray-tracing (RT) engine that increases the scheduler's knowledge by long-term information about the users' propagation characteristics. A convex multiobjective binary-integer-programming formulation for the problem is presented to optimize both the UE's energy efficiency (EE) and QoS. The multiobjective formulation is then used for benchmarking of a low-complexity and computationally efficient heuristic scheduler. The results show that the proposed schedulers have significantly improved the UE's EE and the overall capacity of the system, compared with a recently published EE scheduling scheme while maintaining target QoS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".