MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2339010797 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2016.2555293

QoS-Aware Energy-Efficient Downlink Predictive Scheduler for OFDMA-Based Cellular Devices

2016· article· en· W2339010797 on OpenAlexaff
Karim Hammad, Serguei Primak, Mohamad Kalil, Abdallah Shami

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiple accessComputer scienceQuality of serviceScheduling (production processes)Telecommunications linkUser equipmentFrequency-division multiple accessEfficient energy useReal-time computingComputer networkMathematical optimizationOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingEngineeringBase stationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a predictive energy-efficient scheduling scheme that optimizes the user equipment (UE)'s bits/joule metric subject to quality-of-service (QoS) constraints in downlink orthogonal frequency-division multiple access (OFDMA) systems. This is achieved by minimizing the number of wake-up transmission time intervals (TTIs), where the UE receiver circuit is on, in a longer time horizon than studied before. The proposed predictive scheduler is supported by a ray-tracing (RT) engine that increases the scheduler's knowledge by long-term information about the users' propagation characteristics. A convex multiobjective binary-integer-programming formulation for the problem is presented to optimize both the UE's energy efficiency (EE) and QoS. The multiobjective formulation is then used for benchmarking of a low-complexity and computationally efficient heuristic scheduler. The results show that the proposed schedulers have significantly improved the UE's EE and the overall capacity of the system, compared with a recently published EE scheduling scheme while maintaining target QoS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207