DIRECT KINEMATIC ANALYSIS OF A FAMILY OF 4-DOF PARALLEL MANIPULATORS WITH A PASSIVE CONSTRAINING LEG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents direct kinematic analysis of a family of 3R1T parallel manipulators, while R and T denote the rotational and translational degrees of freedom respectively. The manipulators consist of two rigid bodies, a movable platform and a fixed (base) connected to each other by four active legs and one constraining passive leg. First, the direct position kinematics of the manipulators is analyzed. For a general manipulator of this class, this analysis results in a univariate polynomial of degree 30 along with a set of other univariate polynomials of degree 16 and 4 respectively. However, for a special architecture of the manipulators, it is shown that the direct position kinematics leads to a minimal univariate polynomial of degree 12. A numerical example is also included to confirm the results. Moreover, direct velocity and direct kinematic singularities of the manipulators are analyzed using Jacobian matrices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".