Fracture system evolution within the Cardium sandstone, central Alberta Foothills folds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The natural fracture system developed in the Cardium sandstone is examined in four outcropping structures that represent different stages of fold development. At the incipient stage of folding, the fracture system is dominated by large, widely spaced hybrid fractures that have very small displacements and are aligned in the regional shortening direction (type I orientation). These fractures are naturally propped open by asperities along the fracture surfaces. A lesser number of small thrust faults (type III orientation) are also developed. Extension fractures aligned parallel to the fold axis (type II orientation) begin to develop in the early stage of folding. Through the intermediate stage of folding, there is a progressive increase in the intensity of both type I and type II orientation fractures. Incremental increases in shear displacement on new or reactivated fractures create a gouge of comminuted sandstone grains along the fracture interface. As folding progresses to an advanced stage, there is major increase in the amount of shear displacement on both type I and type II orientation fractures. Many existing fractures coalesce into connected fracture zones and small faults that have shear offsets ranging from several centimeters to several meters. A breccia can result from intense fracturing in the rock within and marginal to these shear features. Slickensides on type I orientation features consistently indicate slip in a subhorizontal direction, even as bed dip increases. Multiple slickenside patterns record reactivation of these features. Type II orientation fractures and small faults consistently undergo bed-perpendicular slip. Type I and type II features both serve to stretch the Cardium sandstone beds but in different directions. Only type III features, which are a minor component of the fracture population, result in bed thickening.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".