MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2339515590 · doi:10.14288/1.0107851

ISAC-II : a project for higher energies at ISAC

2015· article· en· W2339515590 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Triumf-Isac Facility, I. Towner

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the field of nuclear physics it is generally acknowledged that a new frontier will be probed when radioactive ion beams of sufficient intensity and quality become available. With the ISAC facility, TRIUMF has positioned itself as offering the best possible source of exotic beams in the world for many years to come. Based upon the ISOL method of production with a 100 μA, 500 MeV proton beams incident on thick targets, the production source has been built and is starting to operate. The intensity of the proton beam will be progressively increased as the commissioning of the remote handling facilities and the production target development proceed. While the source will produce any elements within the constraints of target/ion source efficiencies, the initial facility, ISAC-I, has been optimized for the requirements of the nuclear astrophysics program (A ≤ 30 and E ≤ 1.5 MeV /u) as far as the accelerator systems are concerned. The scientific program has been initiated and is catering to precision tests of the Standard Model, static properties of exotic nuclei, and opportunities in condensed matter research. ISAC-II is a project that will extend the reach of ISAC-I both in energy and mass. The demands of the nuclear-structure community, in Canada and worldwide, would be largely satisfied by raising the final energy for all masses up to A = 150 to 6.5 MeV/u; an energy sufficient to overcome the Coulomb barrier for all possible target nuclei. Current interests focus on nuclear-structure physics from heavy-ion fusion-evaporation reactions with proton- or neutron-rich projectiles, the spectroscopy of exotic nuclei with resonance reactions, studies of shell structures near the limits of stability, the exploitation of the isospin degree of freedom to study heavy-ion reaction dynamics, Coulomb excitation of neutron-rich nuclei relevant to astrophysical processes and reaction-mechanism studies with neutron-rich projectiles leading to the production of heavy elements. While some of the instruments, which were dispersed after the closure of TASCC, would be reconfigured for a new life at ISAC, some more modern spectrometers would also be built. The accelerator complex would be modified by increasing the energy at which the initial stripping occurs (from 150 keV to 400 keV) by the addition of a short DTL linac section after the present RFQ accelerator. It will be followed by a superconducting linac based upon existing technologies (Legnaro or Argonne). A modular cavity configuration will be used to reach 6.5 MeV/u for A = 150 (and higher energies for lower masses) while maintaining very high transport efficiency throughout the accelerator. The extended mass range is obtained by introducing a state-of-the-art charge-state boosting system between the present ion source/separator system and the RFQ. It is anticipated that an initial configuration giving energies in the 5 MeV/u range for masses up to A = 60 would be available in the latter part of the year 2003. The ISAC experimental complex will require additional buildings to provide space for the new accelerator and their ancillary services as well as a new experimental area for the research program. In the planning, further improvements are anticipated to allow for the possibility of servicing several users concurrently by increasing the number of sources of radioactive ions. With its ISAC-II extension, TRIUMF will provide a truly unique radioactive beam facility, which will meet the demands of a large segment of the community worldwide as was recommended by the Working Group in Nuclear Physics of the OECD Megascience Forum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0040.009
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207