ANALISIS PENGARUH GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE & TINGKAT PROFITABILITAS TERHADAP PENGUNGKAPAN INFORMASI AKUNTANSI (Studi Empiris pada Top 50 Emiten dengan Skor CG Tertinggi Hasil II CD melalui Pendekatan ASEAN Corporate Governance Scorecard Periode 2012-2013
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh Good Corporate Governance dan tingkat profitabilitas terhadap pengungkapan informasi akuntansi. Hasil dari penelitian ini dapat digunakan sebagai rujukan bagi investor untuk mengetahui seberapa jauh pengaruh Good Corporate Governance dan tingkat profitabilitas terhadap pengungkapan informasi akuntansi pada perusahaan non-keuangan yang terdaftar di BEI pada periode 2012-2013. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pengambilan sampel purposive sampling selama tahun 2012 sampai dengan tahun 2013 sehingga diperoleh 20 sampel. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode analsis deskriptif, uji asumsi klasik, uji hipotesis dengan menggunakan program SPSS 20. Hasil pengujian hipotesis menunjukkan bahwa tingkat profitabilitas secara parsial berpengaruh positif terhadap pengungkapan informasi akuntansi, karena profitabilitas menunjukan keberhasilan perusahaan sehingga mempengaruhi tingkat pengungkapan informasi akuntansi perusahaan. Good Corporate Governance secara parsial tidak berpengaruh terhadap pengungkapan informasi akuntansi, Good Corporate Governance tidak berpengaruh terhadap pengungkapan infomasi akuntansi, karena masih kurangnya perhatian perusahaan terhadap IICG sebagai lembaga yang melakukan survei CGPI sehingga menunjukan lemahnya Good Corporate Governance pada perusahaan-perusahaan tersebut.Secara simultan pengaruh Good Corporate Governance dan tingkat profitabilitas dapat berpengaruh positif terhadap pengungkapan informasi akuntansi. Perusahaan yang memiliki tingkat profitabilitas dan Good Corporate Governance akan cenderung mengungkapkan informasi akuntansi yang lebih. Kata Kunci: Good Corporate Governance, Tingkat Profitabilitas, Pengungkapan Informasi Akuntansi Abstract The object of this study is to analyze the influence of Good Corporate Governance and profitability to disclosure of accounting information . The results of this study can be used as a reference for investors to determine how far the influence of Good Corporate Governance and the level of profitability on the disclosure of accounting information on non-financial companies listed on the Stock Exchange in the period 2012-2013. This research used purposive sampling during 2012 to 2013 in order to obtain 20 samples. This research uses the analysis method descriptive, classic assumption test, test hypotheses using SPSS 20. Hypothesis testing results show that the level of profitability is partially positive effect on the disclosure of accounting information, because it shows the success of the company's profitability thus affecting the level of disclosure of corporate accounting. Good Corporate Governance is partially no effect on the disclosure of accounting information, GCG has no effect on the disclosure of accounting information, because it is still a lack of attention companies IICG as an institution conducting the survey that showed weak CGPI Good Corporate Governance for companies tersebut.Secara simultaneous influence Good Corporate Governance and the level of profitability can be a positive influence on the disclosure of accounting information. Companies that have high levels of profitability and good corporate governance will tend to disclose more accounting information. Key Words: Good Corporate Governance, Level of Profitability, Disclosure of Accounting Information Arens, A.A., Randal, J.R., & Mark, S.B. (2014). Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach . England: Pearson. Anik, F. (2013). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Kecurangan (Fraud): Persepsi Pegawai Dinas Provinsi DIY . February 3, 2015. Universitas Negeri Semarang. http://lib.unnes.ac.id/18049/1/7211409097.pdf Bapepam. (2015). Undang-Undang No. 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas . February 4, 2015. http://aria.bapepam.go.id/reksadana/files/regulasi/UU%2040%202007%20Perseroan%20Terbatas.pdf Brigham, E.F., & Houston, J.F. (2013). Fundamentals of Financial Management . United States: Cengage Learning. Effendi, M.A. (2009). The Power of Go o d Corporate Governance: Teori dan Implementasi . Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building Theories From Case Study Research . February 4, 2015. https://www.tu-chemnitz.de/wirtschaft/bwl5/forschung/forschungsseminar/downloads/15/eisenhardt1989.pdf Fakhrudin, H.M. (2008). Go Public: Strategi Pendanaan . Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo. FCGI. (2001). Peranan Dewan Komisaris dan Komite Audit dalam Pelaksanaan Corporate Governance (Tata Kelola Perusahaan) . January 26, 2015. https://muhariefeffendi.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/fcgi_booklet_ii.pdf Ghozali, I., & Chariri. (2007). Teori Akuntansi . Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Ghozali, I. (2005). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariat dengan Program SPSS (3rd ed.). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. IDX. (2015). Ekuitas . February 4, 2015. http://www.idx.co.id/id-id/beranda/informasi/bagiinvestor/saham.aspx Jensen, M.C., & W.H. Meckling. (1976). Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure . Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No.4, pp 305-360. KNKG. (2006). Pedoman Umum Good Corporate Governance Indonesia . Desember 4, 2015. http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/indonesia_ cg_2006_id.pdf KNKG. (2013). Prinsip Dasar Pedoman Good Corporate Governance Perbankan Indonesia. January 26, 2015. http://www.knkg-indonesia.com/KNKGDOWNLOADS/Draft Pedoman GCG Perbankan (singkatan) 9 Jan 2013.pdf Pesek, W. (2011). Olympus, Skandal Korporasi Baru di Jepang . January 26, 2015. Indonesia Finance Today. finance.detik.com/read/2011/11/08/153440/1763010/4/2/skandal-penipuan-korporasi-terbesar-jepang-oleh-olympus Schroeder et al ., (2011). Financial Accounting Theory and Analysis . United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Scott, W.R. (2006). Financial Accounting Theory , 4 th edition . Toronto: Pearson Education, Inc. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2013). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (6th ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Sulistyanto, H. Sri, & Haris, W. (2003). Good Corporate Governance: Berhasilkah Diterapkan di Indonesia . January 27, 2015. http://www.scribd.com/doc/75850311/Artikel#scribd Gulo, Y. (2000). Analisis Efek Luas Pengungkapan sukarela Dalam Laporan Tahunan Terhadap Cost Of Equity Capital Perusahaan, Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi Vol. 2, no. 1 Gunawan, I. (2002). Pengaruh Kelompok Industri, Basis perusahaan, Dan Tingkat Return Terhadap Kualitas Pengungkapan Sukarela Dalam Laporan Tahunan: Studi Empiris Di Bursa Efek Jakarta. Tesis Master. Universitas Gajah Mada. Gunawan, Y. (2001). Analisis Pengungkapan Informasi Laporan Tahunan Pada Perusahaan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Jakarta. Makalah Dipresentasikan dalam Simposium Nasional IV Subiyantoro, E. (1996). Hubungan Antara Kelengkapan Pengungkapan Laporan Dengan Karakteristik Perusahaan Publik di Indonesia. Tesis Master. Universitas Gajah Mada . Subroto, B. (2003). Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kepatuhan Kepada Ketentuan Pengungkapan Wajib Oleh Perusahaan-peursahaan Publik Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kepercayaan Para Investor Di Pasar Modal. Disertasi. Universitas Gajah Mada. Suripto, B. (1998). Pengaruh Karakteristik Perusahaan Terhadap Luas Pengungkapan Sukarela Dalam Laporan Tahunan. Tesis Master. Universitas Gajah Mada . Kaihatu, T. (2006). Good Corporate Governance dan Penerapannya di Indonesia”.Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan. Vol.8 No.1.Maret 2006:1-9 IICG, (2001). “ Corporate Governance: Tata Kelola Perusahaan”. Edisi Ketiga , Jakarta OJK, (2004). Roadmap Tata Kelola Perusahaan Indonesia . Desember 4, 2015. http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/a476310042e2a54bbc09fc384c61d9f7/Indonesia+CG+Roadmap.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".