MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2339649705 · doi:10.5539/ijc.v8n2p33

Graft Copolymerization of Methlymethacrylate on Lignin Produced from Agricultural Wastes

2016· article· en· W2339649705 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. A. Omotoso, Samuel Oluwatosin Ajagun

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemistry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLignin and Wood Chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLigninChemistryFrondNuclear chemistryHuskHydrolysisOrganic chemistryBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Lignin was isolated from banana pseudo stem, palm frond and coconut husk. The moisture content of the banana pseudo stem and palm frond was determined gravimetrically. The lignin was isolated by alkaline hydrolysis with NaOH followed by precipitation with 72% H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>. The isolated lignin was then copolymerized with methyl methacrylate via free radical mechanism. The lignin and the corresponding copolymers were characterised by FTIR analysis.</p><p>The lignin content in banana pseudo stem, palm frond and coconut husk were respectively 16%, 14% and 13% while the grafting percentage of the corresponding lignin with methlymethacrylate (MMA) are 24%, 21% and 19%. These implied that production of lignin from agricultural wastes could reduce the latter solid wastes.</p><p>The FTIR analysis of the different lignin showed important peaks such as O-H band between 3433 cm<sup>-1 </sup>and 3450 cm<sup>-1</sup>; C=C band around 1515 cm<sup>-1 </sup>was absent in palm frond lignin; and C=O band was only observed in coconut husk lignin at 1696 cm<sup>-1</sup>. There was a significant difference in the absorption band of the C-O (ether) of the lignin between 1107 cm<sup>-1</sup>and 1198 cm<sup>-1</sup>. The shift in the absorption peaks in the spectra of the isolated lignin for the different sources of the lignin and the grafting percentage corroborate the fact that the properties and composition of lignin depend on the source of the lignin. The FTIR analysis of the copolymers also showed two prominent peaks for C=O band between 1680 cm<sup>-1 </sup>and 1708 cm<sup>-1</sup>; and C-O (ester) between 1220 cm<sup>-1 </sup>and 1320 cm<sup>-1 </sup>that were absent in the lignin. <sup> </sup>These confirm the presence of the acrylate functional groups.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ChemistrySame topicLignin and Wood ChemistryFrench-language works237,207