Vertical seismic wave gradiometry: Application at the San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT We have developed vertical seismic wave gradiometry (VSWG) to estimate velocity, impedance, and attenuation structure in the vicinity of boreholes using borehole array waveforms of check-shot explosions near the borehole head. We have extended wave gradiometry (WG) theory from a purely local relation of the wavefield and wavefield spatial gradient to one that incorporated the ray ansatz over the length of the borehole for a traveling wave in a vertically inhomogeneous medium. We checked the ray assumption against acoustic full-wave synthetic seismograms, and it was found to yield robust measures of the medium velocity. Anelastic attenuation and impedance structure trade off, but in cases of high anelastic attenuation, realistic bounds can be placed on the seismic impedance that effectively constrains the average attenuation. We have applied these methods to data collected at the San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth borehole in central California in 2005, and we found that the WG velocity estimate agreed well with the borehole acoustic log and previously determined vertical seismic profile results based on traveltime analysis except at the bottom of the hole, where refraction on a near-vertical fault affected the data. The average Q is approximately 20 in the frequency band of 10–30 Hz, and it is required to yield realistic values of impedance in the local medium. Application of VSWG yields appropriate, smoothed velocity models that can be used as an end product or as a starting model for full-wave inversion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".