MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2339719550 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofv133.1361

Multidrug Resistant-Enterobacteriaceae Isolated From Inpatients in North America: TEST 2011–2014

2015· article· en· W2339719550 on OpenAlex
Sibylle Lob, Douglas J. Biedenbach, Meredith Hackel, Dan Sahm, Heidi Leister‐Tebbe

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEnterobacteriaceaeMultiple drug resistanceMicrobiologyTest (biology)AntibioticsEscherichia coliBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacteriaceae pose serious challenges for patient treatment and infection control. Using data from the Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance Trial (TEST), the epidemiology and susceptibility of MDR Enterobacteriaceae from North America were examined. Methods. 9316 Enterobacteriaceae isolates (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., and Serratia spp.) from various specimen sources were collected in Canada and United States (US) from inpatients in 2011-2014. MICs were determined at each site using CLSI broth microdilution method and interpreted according to CLSI guidelines. Isolates were categorized as multi-drug resistant if resistant to ≥3 of the tested drug classes (glycylcyclines, β-lactam/inhibitor, cephems, penems, penicillins [ampicillin], quinolones, tetracyclines, and aminoglycosides). Results. The overall MDR rate for Enterobacteriaceae in 2011-2014 in North America was 19.1%. MDR rates for selected species are shown below. The relatively high MDR rate for E. coli was at least in part due to high levofloxacin resistance of 31% in this species. MDR rates for all Enterobacteriaceae for the years 2011-2014 were 19.7%, 20.1%, 18.8%, and 17.5% (p = 0.04, Cochran-Armitage test for trend). The overall MDR rate for 2011-2014 was 22.0% in Canada versus 18.6% in the United States; 21.5% in ICU wards versus 18.3% in non-ICU wards; and 19.6% in medicine wards versus 18.9% in surgery wards. Susceptibility of MDR pathogens in 2014 was ≤21% to ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and ceftriaxone; 50-70% to cefepime, levofloxacin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and minocycline; and >90% to amikacin, meropenem, and tigecycline. Conclusion. Almost 20% of Enterobacteriaceae were MDR in North America in 2011-2014, although the prevalence appears to be slightly decreasing. MDR rates for Enterobacteriaceae varied by species but overall were fairly similar in United States and Canada as well as across types of wards. Treatment of these isolates is challenging with only amikacin, meropenem, and tigecycline inhibiting >90% in 2014. Disclosures. S. Lob, IHMA, Inc: Independent Contractor, Consulting fee; D. Biedenbach, IHMA, Inc: Independent Contractor, Consulting fee; M. Hackel, IHMA, Inc: Independent Contractor, Consulting fee; D. Sahm, IHMA, Inc: Independent Contractor, Consulting fee; H. Leister-Tebbe, Pfizer, Inc: Employee, Salary

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it