The relative contribution of Saccharina nigripes (Phaeophyceae) to the Bay of Fundy Laminariaceae: spatial and temporal variability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections MEPS 543:153-162 (2016) - DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11566 The relative contribution of Saccharina nigripes (Phaeophyceae) to the Bay of Fundy Laminariaceae: spatial and temporal variability Caroline M. Longtin*, Gary W. Saunders Centre for Environmental and Molecular Algal Research, Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, Canada *Corresponding author: longtin.c@gmail.com ABSTRACT: Previous research on the Laminariaceae in the Maritime Provinces of Canada was completed under the assumption that only 2 species, Saccharina latissima (including S. longicruris; simple blade) and Laminaria digitata (digitate blade), were present in the flora. However, the species S. nigripes, which can look morphologically similar to S. latissima and L. digitata, was recently recorded. We used molecular tools to observe how Laminariaceae community composition varied across fetch distances and years and to determine the relative abundance of S. nigripes in the Bay of Fundy intertidal zone. Over 2 years (2010 and 2011) we studied Laminariaceae across a fetch gradient (sheltered to wave-exposed) in 3 regions (Lepreau, Campobello and Grand Manan), with an additional 3 years (2012 to 2014) of data collected from the Lepreau region. Sheltered sites were most similar to each other and were composed of 99% S. latissima. S. nigripes was rare in its simple-bladed morphology, as well as at sheltered sites, and likely does not affect previous literature on S. latissima. Conversely, S. nigripes was the dominant digitate kelp in 2010 and 2011 at moderate and wave-exposed sites; however, it was rare from 2012 to 2014, which may be correlated with increased water temperature. Previous studies on the ecology and distribution of L. digitata in this region may have included S. nigripes in their observations; therefore, further studies on the Laminariaceae in Atlantic Canada must be performed to determine whether the ecology of L. digitata and S. nigripes differ, as S. nigripes is the dominant digitate kelp in certain years. KEY WORDS: Community structure · Intertidal · Kelp · Laminariaceae · Molecular identity · Saccharina nigripes · Wave exposure Full text in pdf format PreviousNextCite this article as: Longtin CM, Saunders GW (2016) The relative contribution of Saccharina nigripes (Phaeophyceae) to the Bay of Fundy Laminariaceae: spatial and temporal variability. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 543:153-162. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11566 Export citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in MEPS Vol. 543. Online publication date: February 03, 2016 Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599 Copyright © 2016 Inter-Research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".