Whole-body β-oxidation of 18:2ω6 and 18:3ω3 in the pig varies markedly with weaning strategy and dietary 18:3ω3
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Segregated early weaning (SEW) into a cleaner nursery increases food intake and growth in pigs, presumably because of reduced immune stimulation compared with conventionally reared, nonsegregated pigs (NSW). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the oxidation of linoleic acid (18:2omega6) and alpha-linolenic acid (18:3omega3) in SEW and NSW pigs. Pigs consumed a control or high 18:3omega3 diet (omega6 PUFA/omega3 PUFA; 21.3 vs. 2.5, respectively) and were weaned at either 14 days old into a SEW nursery or at 21 days old into a conventional NSW nursery. The major acute-phase protein of pigs but not haptoglobin increased in 35-day-old NSW pigs. NSW pigs had 15-25% lower carcass 18:2omega6 and 20-30% lower carcass 18:3omega3 (% composition) at 49 days old. Between 35- and 49-days-old, NSW pigs had a higher whole-body oxidation of 18:2omega6 (40-120%) and 18:3omega3 (30-80%). The high 18:3omega3 diet decreased the whole-body oxidation of 18:2omega6 by 73% and of 18:3omega3 by 63% in NSW pigs. We conclude that moderately cleaner housing SEW significantly decreases 18:2omega6 and 18:3omega3 oxidation in pigs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".