MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2339853514 · doi:10.1056/nejmsb1601674

Challenges to Data Monitoring Committees When Regulatory Authorities Intervene

2016· article· en· W2339853514 on OpenAlexafffund
Karl Swedberg, Jeffrey Borer, Bertram Pitt, Stuart Pocock, Jean L. Rouleau

Bibliographic record

VenueNew England Journal of Medicine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Failure Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
FundersSahlgrenska AkademinInstitut de Cardiologie de MontréalGöteborgs UniversitetSUNY Downstate Medical CenterUniversité de MontréalUniversity of MichiganImperial College LondonLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
KeywordsMedicineAliskirenClinical trialHarmDrug approvalEnalaprilIntensive care medicineData monitoring committeeMedical emergencyPharmacologyInternal medicineDrugLawRenin–angiotensin systemPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During ATMOSPHERE, a trial comparing aliskiren, enalapril, or both for heart failure, two other trials suggested harm from aliskiren in patients with diabetes, and regulators stopped aliskiren in such patients in ATMOSPHERE. The data monitoring committee suggests that regulators should trust the DMC to ensure patient safety in a clinical trial. The trial sponsor (Novartis) and the regulatory agencies have responded in letters to the editor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.478
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.668
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score0.643

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.4780.668
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.006
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0170.022
Scholarly communication0.0320.040
Open science0.0160.015
Research integrity0.0800.107
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew England Journal of Medicine→Same topicHeart Failure Treatment and Management→French-language works237,207→