Le Mouvement familial au Québec, 1960-1990
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le contexte d'expansion economique et de croissance de l'Etat qui caracterise les annees 1960, la reorganisation des systemes d'education, de bien-etre et de sante entraine un reamenagement des activites et suscite des interets concernant les familles. Des associations familiales nees de l'Action catholique, des associations creees autour de la reforme scolaire, de nouvelles associations de parents en quete de reformes, des associations feminines qui glissent vers le feminisme constituent le terreau d'un mouvement social cree dans la seconde partie des annees 1960. Inspire des mouvements europeens, favorise au depart par des leaders politiques, sociaux et religieux, le Mouvement familial poursuit ses objectifs au cours des annees 1970, tandis que l'on assiste a la montee du mouvement des femmes.L'ouvrage retrace, a partir des documents et memoires issus de 17 federations d'organismes familiaux ou a interet familial, comment la participation de ces groupements (et de plusieurs autres) a diverses activites et revendications, ainsi que leurs interactions avec l'Etat et avec le mouvement des femmes contribuent a la mise en place d'une politique familiale. Outre les domaines de la famille et des associations familiales au centre de l'analyse, cette etude ajoute des donnees inedites a l'historiographie du Quebec moderne en traitant du changement social, de l'emergence des politiques et des institutions sous l'angle de l'apport des mouvements sociaux a ces transformations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".