MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2339973051

Historical Underdosing: Pop Demography and the Crisis in Canadian History

2016· article· en· W2339973051 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert Wright

Bibliographic record

VenueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesIdeologyEthnologyHistoryNarrativePolitical scienceAppealPoliticsArgument (complex analysis)Interpretation (philosophy)SociologyArtLawPhilosophyLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper seeks to problematize the crisis in Canadian history by appeal to three related arguments. The first is that history has largely ceased to inform Canadians’ lives, not because of the failure of institutions, but because of the cultural transformation of their understanding of the past occasioned by new media andespecially by new ideas about how the past is organized. My second claim is that, along with free markets and small government, so-called neo-conservative ideologues in Canada have sought, deliberately if not systematically, to appropriate Canadian history and to deploy it in support of their contemporary political agenda. My third agrument is that this neo-conservative recasting of Canadians’ sense of their own history has been abetted by a powerful new literature I call pop demography , which banishes older notions of the historical past as a coherent, life-informing narrative in favour of a new, market-based interpretation in which the essential component is the generational cohort and the essential historical dynamic is generational competition. Abstract: Cet article cherche a cerner la problematique de la crise qui sevit dans ľhistorie canadienne en invoquant trois arguments connexes. Le premier est que ľhistoire a largement cesse de guider la vie des Canadiens, non pas en raison ďun echec des institutions, mais parce que la facon dont elle se comprenait dans le passe a subi une transformation culturelle causee par les nouveaux medias et surtout les nouvelles idees sur le mode ďorganisation du passe. Notre second argument est que, de meme que les marches libres et le gouvernement restreint, ceux qưon appelle au Canada les ideologues neo-conservateurs ont cherche, de facon deliberee sinon systematique, a s’approprier ľhistoire canadienne et a la deployer pour soutenir leur programme politique de ľheure. Le troisieme argument est que cette refonte neo-conservatrice du sens que les Canadiens ont de leur propre histoire a ete favorisee par une nouvelle documentation influente que j’appellerais la demographie pop , qui rejette completement les vieux concepts voyant dans le passe historique un discours coherent, eclairant la vie, en faveur ďune nouvelle interpretation axee sur les forces du marche dans laquelle ľelement principal est la cohorte des generations et la dynamique historique principale est la competition entre ces generations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0240.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207