MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2339994316 · doi:10.14288/1.0061726

The interaction of sediment bacteria with arsenic compounds

2009· article· en· W2339994316 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jafariah Jaafar

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicArsenic contamination and mitigation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArsenicBacteriaSedimentEnvironmental scienceChemistryEnvironmental chemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In general, bacteria are capable of biotransforming inorganic arsenic into methylarsenic acids and arsines. The microbial activity of lake sediments was examined with respect to the mobilization of mine tailings that have a high arsenic content. Aerobic and anaerobic mixed microbial populations were isolated from Kam Lake, Yellowknife, N.W.T. An aerobic microbial population from 5 cm sediment depth, the layer immediately above the contaminated mine tailings, was capable of transforming arsenicals. Speciation of arsenicals in the culture medium, determined by using hydride generation - gas chromatography - atomic absorption spectrometry (HG-GC-AAS) shows that this bacterial population is able to methylate arsenicals and subsequently demethylate the product. However, only methylation was observed in media containing dimethylarsinic acid. Anaerobic microbial populations, from all depths, produce a yellow precipitate upon incubation with arsenate for 10-14 days. The precipitate was identified as AS₂S₃ by microanalysis and scanning electron microscope + energy dispersive x-ray (SEM + EDX). The anaerobic microbial population, which should not contain sulfate-reducing organisms, appears to be arsenic tolerant; there is no evidence of methylation of arsenic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.166
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicArsenic contamination and mitigationFrench-language works237,207