MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2340173529

Occurrence of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy among Type 2 Diabetic Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital

2015· article· en· W2340173529 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sasi Sekhar, Bharati Devi Gorantla, Kranthi Kumar, Reddy Navuluri, Renuka Devi Nalluri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)Diabetes mellitusPeripheral neuropathyPopulationType 2 diabetesInternal medicineCross-sectional studyBlood sugarPediatricsEndocrinologyPathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Diabetes affects 382 million people worldwide, and its prevalence is expected to increase to 592 million by the year 2035. Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) is a common type of diabetic neuropathy and the most common cause of neuropathic pain. Hence, there is a need to access the incidence and the prevalence of this condition. The incidence of diabetes and its complications has increased to a greater extent among the rural population which have to be concentrated as there are lesser studies available for that population groups. Materials and Methods: Incidence is tested by a cross-sectional descriptive study consisting of two phases: Phase 1, an initial screening questionnaire including one question about pain; Phase 2, neurological history and examination using the Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS). The observations thus obtained are evaluated with suitable statistics tool (SPSS version 16), and results are represented in the form of fig ures and graphs. Results: Total number of subjects were 100 of them 59 were male and 41 were female. Diabetic age of the individuals ranges between 2 and 19 years. The highest score with TCSS was 13 and least was 3. More than 86% of the subjects were suffering from peripheral neuropathy among which 46% are with mild and 35% with moderate and 5% with severe grades of DPN. Incidence of PDPN was increasing rapidly with the raising fasting blood sugar (FBS) levels and was 100% with FBS levels more than 261 mg/dl. Conclusions: PDPN incidence among the diabetic individuals is relatively high in the study population. Age does not influence the occurrence of PDPN among the diabetics while the diabetic age of the individuals has a highly significant relation with the occurrence of PDPN. The occurrence of PDPN was more among the individuals with high FBS levels which indicate the necessity of controlled glycemic levels in the prevention of complications associated with diabetes mellitus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPain Mechanisms and Treatments→French-language works237,207→