Dynamics Behavior of a Guided Spline Spinning Disk, Subjected to Conservative In-Plane Edge Loads, Analytical and Experimental Investigation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The governing linear equations of transverse motion of a spinning disk with a splined inner radius and constrained from lateral motion by guide pads are derived. The disk is driven by a matching spline arbor that offers no restraint to the disk in the lateral direction. Rigid body translational and tilting degrees-of-freedom are included in the analysis of total motion of the spinning disk. The disk is subjected to lateral constraints and loads. Also considered are applied conservative in-plane edge loads at the outer and inner boundaries. The numerical solution of these equations is used to investigate the effect of the loads and constraints on the natural frequencies, critical speeds, and stability of a spinning disk. The sensitivity of eigenvalues of spline spinning disk to the in-plane edge loads is analyzed by taking the derivative of the spinning disk's eigenvalues with respect to the loads. An expression for the energy induced in the spinning disk by the in-plane loads, and their interaction at the inner radius, is derived by computation of the rate of work done by the lateral component of the edge loads. Experimental idling and cutting tests for a guided spline saw are conducted at the critical speed, super critical speeds, and at the flutter instability speed. The cutting results at different speeds are compared to show that the idling results of a guided spline disk can be used to predict stable operation speeds of the system during cutting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".