FOURTH HUTTON SYMPOSIUM ON THE ORIGIN OF GRANITES AND RELATED ROCKS,: edited by Bernard Barbarin, William Edryd Stephens, Bernard Bonin, Jean-Luc Bouchez, David Barrie Clarke, Michel Cuney, and Hervé Martin, GSA Special Paper 350, 2001, 321 p. (originally published as Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, v. 91, parts 1 & 2)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This volume is the fourth in a series, published jointly by GSA and the Royal Society of Edinburgh, in which selected contributions from the quadrennial Hutton symposia are published. The twenty-three papers reflect the flavor of the meeting, which in turns reflects the status of research on problems related to granitic rocks at the close of the 20th century. This continuing series of symposia was conceived in the 1980’s and first held in Edinburgh in 1987 to commemorate James Hutton and his initial address to the Royal Society concerning the initially fluid, or magmatic, state of granite. Though titled “The Origin of Granites and Related Rocks,” the symposia have been from the beginning much more wide-ranging than that. Granites are treated very sensu lato and other very different rocks that bear upon granites, notably basalts, receive considerable coverage. Furthermore, not just origins of magmas but essentially all geological aspects of granitic rocks receive scrutiny, e.g., melt segregation, ascent, and emplacement; magma chamber and volcanic processes; ore deposits; and tectonic implications of felsic magmatism. The four symposia have been held in Edinburgh; Canberra, Australia, in 1991; College Park, USA, in 1995; and Clermont-Ferrand, France, in 1999. As might be expected with the passage of time and locations on three different continents, the general emphases and the distribution of subjects of papers has varied considerably from conference to conference, as has the geographical distribution of participants. The first volume, whose authorship was dominated by Britain, the USA, and other English-speaking nations (17 of 19 first authors), really …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.066 | 0.026 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".