MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2340244419 · doi:10.21205/deufmd.20165217547

MONASCUS PIGMENT PRODUCTION WITH FOOD RESIDUES (STALE BREAD AND SOUR YOGHURT): A COMPARATIVE KINETIC ANALYSIS

2016· article· en· W2340244419 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDeu Muhendislik Fakultesi Fen ve Muhendislik · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrobial Metabolism and Applications
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonascusFood sciencePigmentChemistryExtremophileBiologyFermentationBiochemistryThermophileEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Colorants are one of the most important additives in food industry. Preference of natural colorants has become highly concerned compounds since many studies have indicated the harmful effect of synthetic colorants. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the pigment production yield of Monascus purpureus from different food residues. Growth parameters of M.purpureus were followed during 14 days for the responses of yield, pigment profile and Monascus metabolites. Results indicated that dairy residues and stale bread could be economic, efficient and easily available substrate for M.purpureus pigment production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.383
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it