Impact of pulmonary disease on patient-reported outcomes and patient-performed functional testing in systemic lupus erythematosus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study examines the effect of pulmonary disease on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-performed outcome (PPO) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients at a single tertiary referral center. METHODS: Pulmonary function tests (PFTs), chest imaging, SLE-related damage, and disease activity were examined in 110 SLE patients. Presence was noted of abnormal PFTs, pleural disease, pulmonary hypertension (PH), pulmonary infarction, interstitial lung disease (ILD), and shrinking lung syndrome (SLS). PROs included the Medical Outcome Short Form-36 Health Survey, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Fatigue Severity Scale, Borg Dyspnea Scale, patient dyspnea and cough. The PPO of interest was the six-minute walk test (6MWT). Relationships amongst PROs, 6MWT, and pulmonary disease were studied. RESULTS: Pulmonary disease was present in 62 (56%) of 110 subjects: 54 (49%) abnormal PFT, 13 (12%) pleural disease, 12 (11%) ILD, 11 (10%) SLS and five (5%) PH. Dyspnea was the only PRO found to be significantly associated with pulmonary disease (P = 0.0004). Participants with pulmonary disease compared to those without had significantly reduced distance (P = 0.00015, 95% CI for mean 39-125 m) and predicted distance (P = 0.00001, 10%-26%) on 6MWT. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary disease is common in SLE and adversely impacts 6MWT distance and dyspnea without apparent influence on other PROs. The 6MWT may be a promising tool in the assessment of pulmonary disease in SLE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".