MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2340574172 · doi:10.11646/zootaxa.3502.1.1

Unravelling cryptic species diversity in eastern Nearctic paper wasps, Polistes (Fuscopolistes), using male genitalia, morphometrics and DNA barcoding, with descriptions of two new species (Hymenoptera: Vespidae)

2012· article· en· W2340574172 on OpenAlexaff
Matthias Buck, Tyler Cobb, Julie K. Stahlhut, Robert Hanner

Bibliographic record

VenueZootaxa · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphRoyal Alberta Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyNearctic ecozoneDNA barcodingVespidaeHymenopteraPolistesZoologyKey (lock)MorphometricsSpecies complexMale genitaliaTaxonomy (biology)EcologyPhylogenetic tree

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A study of male genitalia, morphometric head measurements and DNA barcoding revealed three overlooked species in eastern Nearctic Polistes (Fuscopolistes), two of which are described here: P. (F.) hirsuticornis Buck, sp. nov. and P. (F.) parametricus Buck, sp. nov. Polistes carolina of authors is a complex of two or three species. Type studies also uncovered new synonymies: P. rubiginosus Lepeletier, 1836, sp. restit. (=P. perplexus Cresson, 1872, syn. nov.; P. generosus Cresson, 1872, syn. nov.); P. nigripennis (De Geer, 1773) is removed from synonymy with P. carolina (Linnaeus, 1767) and tentatively synonymized with P. canadensis (Linnaeus, 1758) (=Vespa nigripennis De Geer, 1773, syn. nov.). A revised key to eastern Nearctic Fuscopolistes Richards, 1973 is presented. The male genitalia of eastern Nearctic species are illustrated in detail for the first time, and a preliminary genitalic key is presented. DNA barcoding revealed strongly divergent genetic lineages in three species besides "P. carolina". A so-called 'barcoding gap' was not detected, thereby ruling out species delimitation through divergence thresholds. Indirect evidence suggests that the newly described species may be obligate social parasites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.649

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZootaxaSame topicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207