MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cationic Galactose-Conjugated Copolymers for Epidermal Growth Factor (EGFR) Knockdown in Cervical Adenocarcinoma

2016· article· en· W2340692535 on OpenAlexafffund
Stephen Quan, Piyush Kumar, Ravin Narain

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates - Health Solutions
KeywordsMethacrylamideRaftGlycopolymerCopolymerChain transferHeLaAgarose gel electrophoresisCationic polymerizationChemistryBiophysicsMaterials sciencePolymer chemistryBiochemistryPolymerBiologyAcrylamideCellOrganic chemistryRadical polymerizationDNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glycopolymers of statistical and block configurations were synthesized from 2-lactobionamidoethyl methacrylamide (LAEMA) and 2-aminoethyl methacrylamide hydrochloride (AEMA) by the reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization. These cationic glycopolymers were found to form very stable polyplexes with EGFR siRNA as determined by dynamic light scattering and agarose gel electrophoresis. The polyplexes revealed to be very stable even in the presence of serum proteins. Transfection studies of the glycopolymer-EGFR siRNA polyplexes were achieved in HeLa cells to determine the EGFR knockdown efficiency, cellular uptake and cytotoxicity. In this study, the block copolymer with the shortest AEMA segment was the most effective in EGFR gene silencing, however this block copolymer revealed to be slightly more toxic as compared to the statistical copolymers studied at higher w/w ratios. In addition, gene silencing of up to 80-85% was achieved with this low-molecular-weight block copolymer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Biomaterials Science & EngineeringSame topicRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryFrench-language works237,207