MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2340964651

THE EFFECT OF BALANCED STRATEGY INSTRUCTION ON ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER LITERACY

2016· article· en· W2340964651 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jacqueline R Wettlaufer

Bibliographic record

VenueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicReading and Literacy Development
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiteracyMathematics educationReading comprehensionReading (process)PsychologyVocabularyPedagogyLinguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

English Language Learner (ELL) achievement on standardized testing in a second language (L2; English) has been shown to be compromised due to L2 literacy deficits demonstrated by many of these students (Cheng, Fox, & Zheng, 2007; Solorzano, 2008; Zheng, Cheng, & Klinger, 2007). ELL achievement results on the Ontario Secondary School Diploma (OSSD) literacy requirement, the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test (OSSLT), have remained consistently a minimum of 10% below that of students whose first language (L1) is English (Education Quality and Accountability Office, 2015a). The focus of this quasi-experimental study was to improve ELL L2 literacy, specifically achievement of reading skills, using a targeted intervention which consisted of a series of balanced strategy literacy sessions. This explicitly instructed balanced strategy literacy program was delivered in an after school format to secondary school ELL students who were randomly assigned to treatment (use of L1 and L2) and sub-treatment groups (use of L2 only). Balanced strategy instruction utilized the construction-integration model of reading comprehension (Kintsch, 1988) as a direct application of social-cognitive constructivist theory to engage students in the building of L2 literacy skills through choral reading, guided reading, independent reading, peer discussions and high interest vocabulary development. Research results indicated that the treatment method used did not have a significant effect on ELL achievement of reading skills in L2, as measured by the 2014 OSSLT in comparison to pre-intervention achievement on the 2010 OSSLT. Research results also indicated higher achievement levels on the 2014 OSSLT for ELL students who had greater exposure to L2 development (e.g., prior courses, daily practice). Following the study, the ELL students’ development of L2 literacy skills continued within the context of secondary school credit courses towards successful completion of the OSSD. These findings suggest that more research is needed to determine the effective implementation of balanced strategy literacy programming as a support to ELL demonstration of graduation diploma requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.495

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)Same topicReading and Literacy DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207