MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2341169798 · doi:10.5603/kp.a2014.0219

Safety and biocompatibility of a novel self-expanding nitinol carotid stent with hybrid cell design in a porcine model of neointimal hyperplasia

2015· article· en· W2341169798 on OpenAlexaff
Adam Janas, Krzysztof Milewski, Piotr Buszman, Przemysław Nowakowski, Michał Jelonek, Bartłomiej Orlik, Agata Krauze, Stefan Samborski, Diane Beaudry, Guy Lecelrc, Marek Król, Jean‐Martin Lapointe, Wojciech Wojakowski, Anna Turek, R. Stefan Kiesz, Paweł Buszman

Bibliographic record

VenueKardiologia Polska · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsAccelLab (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStentNeointimal hyperplasiaNuclear medicineGynecologyInternal medicineRestenosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Stent design may influence the outcomes, suggesting that adverse event rates vary according to free cell area and cell design. Open cell design technology of self-expandable stents, dedicated for carotid revascularisation has better deliverability, although closed cell technology is expected to cause fewer thromboembolic events. AIM: To evaluate the feasibility and vascular response of novel, hybrid cell, self-expandable nitinol stents (MER®, Balton, Poland) implanted into porcine carotid arteries. Hybrid cell design combines open and closed cell technology. METHODS: All tested stents were implanted with 10% overstretch into 10 carotid segments of Polish domestic pigs. Control angiography was obtained immediately before and after vascular interventions as well as 28 days after the procedure. Thereafter, animals were sacrificed, and the treated segments were harvested and evaluated in the independent histopathology laboratory. RESULTS: All stents were easily introduced and implanted, showing good angiographic acute outcome. At 28 days, in the angiography, all vessels were patent with no signs of thrombi or excessive neointimal formation, with the late lumen loss of -0.11 ± 0.3 mm and percentage diameter stenosis 10.18 ± 8.1%. There was a 10% increase in the vessel reference diameter when compared to baseline (4.57 ± 0.5 vs. 4.96 ± 0.3 mm, p < 0.01). In the histopathology, mean area stenosis was 17.4% and mean intimal thickness was 0.20 mm. At histopathology, the mean injury, inflammation, and fibrin scores were low. Endothelialisation was complete in all stents, and neointimal tissue appeared moderately mature as shown by the moderate mean neointimal smooth muscle score. Nonetheless, histopathology shows one stent affected by peri-strut granulomas and one stent affected by marked mineralisation. CONCLUSIONS: The novel Polish self-expandable nitinol carotid stent with hybrid cell technology shows optimal biocompatibility and a vascular healing profile, and therefore may be introduced for first-in-man application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKardiologia PolskaSame topicCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207