MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2341207708 · doi:10.2138/am-2004-0406

An X-ray and electron microprobe study of Fe, Ni, Ga, and Ge distribution and local structure in a section of the Canyon Diablo iron meteorite

2004· article· en· W2341207708 on OpenAlexaff
Ronald G. Cavell, Elspeth M. Barnes, Patricia Arboleda, P. A. Cavell, Renfei Feng, R. A. Gordon, M. Adam Webb

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKamaciteIron meteoriteMeteoriteElectron microprobePhosphideExtended X-ray absorption fine structureMaterials scienceX-ray absorption spectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)NickelGeologyMineralogyChemistryMetallurgyAbsorption spectroscopyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using X-rays produced by a third generation synchrotron at the Pacific Northwest Consortium Collaborative Access Team (PNC-CAT), Advanced Photon Source (APS), Argonne National Laboratory, the distribution of Fe, Ni, Ga, and Ge in a sample of the Canyon Diablo iron meteorite has been mapped microscopically in situ with a 5 μm × 5 μm spatial resolution. The principal phases investigated were kamacite (αFe/Ni alloy, <6 wt% Ni), cohenite [a carbide, (Fe,Ni,Co)3C], and schreibersite [a phosphide, (Fe,Ni)3P]. A non-microscopic X-ray absorption analysis at the P edge indicated the presence of both phosphide and phosphate in the sample. Extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) analysis of Fe in kamacite reflects the known bcc structure of kamacite. EXAFS analysis of Ni, Ga, and Ge indicates that these elements substitute for Fe within the kamacite bcc structure. Absorption edge shifts for these same elements are generally small relative to the metals themselves, suggestive of a metallic environment. Initial findings also suggest that Ga preferentially partitions into schreibersite (phosphide) rather than cohenite (carbide), whereas Ge behaves differently and is found principally in the kamacite. These observations further the understanding of the Ge and Ga budget within the Canyon Diablo meteorite, and the work also illustrates the potential of the X-ray microprobe technique for the study of meteorites. Other potential uses of the X-ray microprobe are indicated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score0.953

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence AnalysisFrench-language works237,207