MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2341283468 · doi:10.14288/1.0075257

Dispersal and development of the striped ambrosia beetle trypodendron lineatum (oliv.) in industrial sorting and storage areas

2009· article· en· W2341283468 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rory L. McIntosh

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Insect Ecology and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiological dispersalAmbrosia beetleBiologySortingEcologyAmbrosiaPopulationPollenCurculionidaeMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ambrosia beetles, in particular the striped ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum (Olivier.) [Coleoptera: Scolytidae] cause serious degrade to logs harvested in British Columbia. Losses to the Coastal forest industry have been estimated at $120 million per annum. Although 75% of the damage occurs in the forest, 25% occurs while logs are at sorting and storage areas. Populations of ambrosia beetles are spread in logs transported into these areas. Industrial sites become contaminated when beetles egress stored logs and fly to the forest margin to overwinter. These individuals comprise the spring flight the following year and will attack any susceptible stored logs at that time. Mass trapping beetles is an accepted component of integrated pest management around industrial sites. Traps baited with lineatin, cL-pinene and ethanol are commonly used. A Latin square experiment was conducted to test, these components singly, and in combination to elucidate which component or combination of components are best to trap “sister flight” beetles. Results demonstrated that c-pinene and ethanol did not significantly enhance trapping performance and that lineatin is the only significant trap bait for trapping “sister flight” beetles. Lineatin-baited traps located in the Foreshore Park area of the Pacific Spirit Park in Vancouver, were used to trap 1993 sister flight beetles. The same traps were re-baited in 1994 to monitor the mass flight. There was a positive correlation of mass attack catches with sister flight trap catches. Temperature related heat sum model experiments of T lineatum development were conducted at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver. Beetles were inoculated into log bolts left to develop in controlled conditions at 18, 20, 25 and 30 °C, under ambient conditions at the U.B.C. South Campus. A threshold temperature of 12.34 °C was derived and used in the calculation of accumulated heat sum. Sister flight activity was indicated by presence of empty niches after 65 days or 324 degree days. Internal log temperatures were monitored at the South Campus. High mortality precluded brood development in the top and west quadrants of the log where temperatures commonly exceeded 35 °C. Brood development and survivorship were greater in the bottom and eastern quadrants of the log. It was recommended that lineatin alone is sufficient for trapping sister flight beetles. Additional lineatin-baited traps should be used to develop a database to derive a predictive model to determine mass flight numbers from sister flight trap catches to help focus future mass trapping operations. The threshold temperature of 12.34 °C could be used to derive universal model of T lineatum development. Accumulated heat sum of 324 units could be used to predict sister flight. Key Words: ambrosia beetle; degree-day; development threshold; dry-land sorts; heat sum; mass trapping; semiochemicals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.166
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicForest Insect Ecology and ManagementFrench-language works237,207