MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2341404252 · doi:10.14288/1.0055808

What the elementary schools should be doing : blueprints from three Canadian provinces - Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia

2010· article· en· W2341404252 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
H. Olukayode Alapini

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCollaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examined major provincial curriculum-defining documents produced during the period 1969 to 1977 in Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia, Canada, in order to identify: (1) the reasons for the preparation of the documents, (2) the processes by which the documents were prepared, (3) the recommendations made concerning priorities for the elementary schools curriculum, and (4) any possible applications for the Nigerian educational systems. The conceptualization used in the study represented curriculum as a process of societal educational decision-making and a product of that process. The conceptualization was used as an analytical tool to examine the source documents. The specific questions used in the study are of two types - process and product. The questions relating to process were intended to identify in the source documents the procedures used for their preparation. The questions relating to product sought to identify in the documents the curricula for the elementary schools. A comparative analysis of the findings about the procedures showed essential differences between the Ontario and the Alberta documents on the one hand and the British Columbia document on the other. Two policy decision-making models (rational-participatory and reactive-adversarial) were used to examine the procedures. The rational-participatory model was recommended for the Nigerian educational systems. An assessment of the procedural methods observed in the three Canadian documents indicated that the methods could apply to Nigerian settings in a particular way which could facilitate the involvement of both the literate and the illiterate in the process of a societal education decision-making. A comparative analysis of the findings about the curriculum for the elementary schools showed that the three Canadian documents display in their statements of ends and means of schooling considerable variety in breadth, specificity, and clarity. The advantages of specificity may be offset to some extent by the way in which broader statements may facilitate curriculum development within the framework which they provide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicCollaborative Teaching and InclusionFrench-language works237,207