Bibliographic record
Abstract
La letteratura migrante nel Quebec gode di una vitalita e di un interesse rinnovato che testimoniano la sua importanza poiche essa contribuisce a dare un volto nuovo alla letteratura quebecchese invitando a ripensare l’identita ed il rapporto all’alterita. I numerosi studi che si interessano a tale soggetto insistono sull’importanza e sulla particolarita della letteratura scritta dai neo-quebecchesi non solamente perche e l’espressione di una societa multiculturale, ma anche in ragione di un profondo cambiamento nella maniera di concepire l’alterita. Nel suo saggio intitolato Figures de l’Autre dans le roman quebecois, Janet Paterson spiega che se la letteratura quebecchese si e sempre interessata al discorso dell’Altro, a partire dagli anni ottanta con il fenomeno della letteratura migrante sono cambiate le basi del discorso poiche l’Altro, come personaggio, non e piu visto e descritto da un punto di vista esterno, ma passa da oggetto a soggetto del discorso. La letteratura migrante rende quindi «etat de la parole de l’Autre, et tout particulierement de l’experience de son alterite» (138). Essa si caratterizza per l’eterogeneita dei temi e delle interrogazioni che riflettono, nel testo letterario, i cambiamenti che si vivono in seno alla societa. Come spiega Pierre L’Herault,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.042 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".