Barriers to Viral Suppression Among Female Sex Workers: Role of Structural and Intimate Partner Dynamics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Despite global evidence that sex workers (SWs) are disproportionately impacted by HIV, data on HIV treatment outcomes among SWs living with HIV remains sparse. This study examined the correlates of undetectable plasma viral load (pVL) among street- and off-street SWs living with HIV and on antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Metro Vancouver, Canada. METHODS: Analyses drew on data (2010-2014) from a longitudinal cohort of SWs (An Evaluation of Sex Workers Health Access) and confidential linkages with the Drug Treatment Program (DTP) data on ART dispensation and outcomes. Bivariate and multivariable generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to identify longitudinal correlates of undetectable pVL (<50 copies/mL). RESULTS: Of the 72 SWs living with HIV who had ever used ART, 38.9% had an undetectable pVL at baseline. Although 84.7% had undetectable pVL at least once over the study period, 18.1% exhibited sustained undetectable pVL. In multivariable generalized linear mixed-effects model analyses, ≥95% pharmacy refill adherence (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 4.21; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.16 to 8.19) and length of time since diagnosis (AOR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.13) were positively correlated with undetectable pVL. Having an intimate male partner (AOR = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.78) and being homelessness were negatively correlated with undetectable pVL (AOR = 0.22; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.47). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to more closely consider the social and structural contexts that shape SWs' experiences on ART and impact treatment outcomes, including the gendered power dynamics within intimate partnerships. Future research on HIV care among SWs is urgently needed, alongside structural and community-led interventions to support SWs' access to and retention in care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".