MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2341859722

Load shaping via grid wide coordination of heating-cooling electric loads: A mean field games based approach

2015· article· en· W2341859722 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roland P. Malhamé, Arman C. Kizilkale

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers du GERAD · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGridDistributed generationAggregate (composite)Load balancing (electrical power)SmoothingComputer scienceEngineeringRenewable energyElectrical engineeringMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pressure on ancillary reserves in power systems has significantly mounted due to the recent generalized increase of the fraction of (highly fluctuating) wind and solar energy sources in grid generation mixes. Dedicated energy storage devices have seen their role reaffirmed as potentially low carbon print, if expensive tools, for smoothing the resulting generation/demand imbalances. However, a hitherto under utilized, relatively inexpensive energy storage alternative is that formed by the tiny energy wells of electric origin attached to millions of individual customer electric thermal loads. A hierarchical mean field games approach is proposed for shaping their collective load, whereby the top level sets system optimal mean aggregate temperature target trajectories. In turn based on a local state and a mean field dependent cost function, each individual load develops a decentralized local control law such that the aggregate load can meet the set targets. This control law is to be followed only as long as local comfort and safety constraints are secured, thus guaranteeing acceptability by customers. The corresponding mathematical theory is developed and numerical results are reported. Acknowledgments: The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Natural Resources Canada. Les Cahiers du GERAD G–2015–68 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.644
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers du GERADSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207