Citizenship and the relation with knowledge in the teacher training curriculum: Unveiling meanings of the educational practices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo: O texto Cidadania e relacao com o saber no curriculo de formacao de professor: desvelando sentidos da pratica educativa apresenta parte dos resultados de uma pesquisa qualitativa junto a dez professores de uma universidade publica, sobre o conceito de cidadania, particularmente, no contexto de suas praticas educativas incluidas num curriculo de formacao de professores. Tece uma discussao sobre o conceito de cidadania, incluindo as principais visoes existentes na literatura brasileira, denominadas neste estudo: cidadania de direitos restritos e cidadania como construcao social, e sobre o conceito de relacao com o saber. A relacao com o saber, como um processo criativo, desdobra-se na relacao do estudante consigo mesmo, com os outros, com as regras e com o poder. Um curriculo orientado na perspectiva da formacao da cidadania como construcao social possibilita, aos estudantes, uma relacao com o saber nao-dogmatica, portanto, critica, reflexiva, participativa, interdisciplinar, baseada num clima de respeito mutuo e de parceria na construcao do conhecimento, de atitudes e de valores. A discussao dos resultados da pesquisa deixou evidente que, nas praticas educativas, expressas nos depoimentos dos professores participantes, fica limitado o espaco para o exercicio de uma relacao com o saber capaz de engendrar a construcao do conhecimento, o aprofundamento da relacao consigo mesmo, com os outros e com as regras e a formacao da cidadania como construcao social. Ainda, que existe a predominância de uma visao de formacao para a cidadania, principalmente, intelectualista e cognitivista, centrada no “dever ser”. Palavras-chave: curriculo, formacao de professor, cidadania, relacao com o saber.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.040 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".